|
theyoungersister previous posts far from geek i told myself not to blog about dr*v**g did you know midsem sexymen do you realise how to feel better he loves me, he loves me not. happy valentines. twilight past December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 links ashley! jingaling nini theOlderSister yunwen (: PostSecret
Shouts Credits Base code:OHsaygoodbye Image: Kristi |
Wednesday, April 30, 2008 hypothetically speaking 12:11 PM hai. 0 comments Monday, April 28, 2008 fashion 1:51 PM it's as if there's a non-acceptance of studying. as if it's uncool to study so how about i make up for the apparent nerdyness by going for a fag break? and no, it's not just restricted to the individual. fag breaks require you to canvass the support of every other smoking male or female to go out and participate in the filthy habit with you. even better - if you don't have your own cigarettes (cos you're a cheap indian) but you're addicted and you need those packaged tar sticks, mass smoke breaks are great cos then you can take them off others. and you can rotate who you take them from so no one will find out your sneaky plan (ya right). and of course, fag breaks are great for gossiping about women, men, yesterday's conquets etc etc. thanks for doing that loudly. oh but please, find another spot? there's a camera, if you didn't know. 1 comments Saturday, April 19, 2008 !?!!?!??!?! 2:30 PM a stochastic process is a process with a stochastic trend. if a stochastic process is not stationary, then it is said to be nonstationary. i don't know, you tell me. 0 comments Friday, April 18, 2008 as i ponder my meaningless existence 12:19 AM i cannot seem to remember ANYTHING. seriously. my memory has taken a vacation to, um, i can't remember where. i started wondering why i decided to attempt economics in university. i have concluded that it is to up my marriageable worth. if i had done engineering, or law, or medicine, i would be considered intruding into a man's world. and no man wants a woman who is smarter than him, right? well, if we restrict this discussion to solely indian men, this is very true. indian men need to feel superior, that they are better than their women so that their egos can be pacified. so being in a 'man's field' would hence render me unmarriageable. so i'm in arts. but men, at the same time, do not want an arts dum dum as their future wife! they have a reputation to uphold, am i right? they will not want their friends to judge them if they happen to get together with an airhead. that would be a blow to their massive egos. so the girl has to have a balance of intelligence and stupidity - she cannot be smart enough (i.e as intelligent as the man) but she cannot be stupid either. so, yes, econs. in arts, it is the most revered major for its toughness and the amount of work it requires. at least in nus la. admit it, you need some brains to attempt the mathematical approach that the uni takes. everyone wants good grades. everyone is smart (but of course not as smart as engineers/lawters/doctors). so relatively speaking, econs is a good major to take to give you the right balance (or equillibrium, as economists would say) because it reflects that you have some amount of intelligence but you aren't that smart that you will intimidate your man. right? right. marry me! *giggles and twirls hair, and furiously scribbles econs/math formulas at the same time* 0 comments Thursday, April 10, 2008 overexposure 10:17 PM gah. die micro DIE. 0 comments Sunday, April 06, 2008 goodbye gopal 10:21 AM eurgh. boys. all i had to do was yell out the question in the car and i had 4 boys yelling 1-1! eurgh. boys. 0 comments Tuesday, April 01, 2008 the economics of marriage 10:02 PM do you, principal, take this agent to give you the maximum expected utility possible under your budget constraints and bilateral asymmetric information, through diminishing marginal returns, accepting the risk of adverse selection, tolerating moral hazrd, assuming stable preferences, in a good state and bad, until the long run when you are dead? 0 comments |